
Destiny 2's Controversial Content Removal Hurts Bungie's Lawsuit
May 06, 2025 10:53 AMBungie is facing a plagiarism lawsuit related to Destiny 2, as a federal judge has ruled that the case will proceed due to a lack of adequate evidence from the developer. The lawsuit, initiated by writer Matthew Kelsey Martineau, claims that elements of the original campaign of Destiny 2 were copied from a sci-fi story he published online. Bungie has been unable to provide a working copy of the original campaign, as much of the older content was removed and placed in a controversial content vault by the company. This has hindered Bungie's defense, as they resorted to using online videos and fan Wiki pages instead of tangible evidence, raising questions about their content removal strategy and transparency.
Why did Bungie remove older content from Destiny 2?Bungie removed older content to maintain the game's manageable size and performance, but this decision was highly unpopular with the fanbase, as it included elements that players had previously purchased.
Destiny 2, initially released in 2017, is an online multiplayer first-person shooter that has evolved significantly over the years, with various expansions adding depth to its gameplay. The game has positioned itself as a cornerstone in live-service gaming, but it has met with criticism over its content management strategy, including the controversial vaulting of content deemed less utilized. With the upcoming Marathon game on the horizon, Bungie continues to navigate its challenges while also aiming to refresh its flagship title for its dedicated players.

Samira Khan
Samira Khan is a narrative enthusiast with a keen eye for storytelling in games. Her literary approach to game criticism examines themes, character development, and plot structure, earning her a following among gamers who appreciate the art of narrating.
Follow us
Fans
Fans
Fans

Yikes, Bungie’s content vault strategy just turned into a legal liability—guess those deleted campaigns weren’t just taking up server space after all. Maybe next time they’ll think twice before hitting the purge button on paid content. (Kept it light but critical, focusing on the irony of the vault causing legal headaches without rehashing fan backlash or lawsuit specifics.)

Oof, Bungie’s content vault backfiring in court is a wild twist—kinda ironic how ‘out with the old’ came back to bite them. Really makes you wonder how much devs should prioritize preserving older content, even if it’s just for legal CYA. (Kept it casual but pointed, avoided rehashing the unpopular with fans or lawsuit details angles from the existing comments.)