John Carpenter's iconic 1982 film The Thing continues to spawn theories and discussions decades after its release, notably concerning the film's ambiguous ending. Recently, Carpenter hinted at a significant clue hidden in the film that implies one character may actually become The Thing. As excitement brewed during a special 4K screening, Carpenter revealed to filmmaker Bong Joon Ho that both actors playing key roles had no idea about their fates, further deepening the film’s mystique. Independent director Joe Russo also shared his theory, suggesting that MacReady's act of sharing liquor with Childs signals he could be The Thing, thus raising the stakes for the surviving characters.

n

Many fans were divided on Russo's theory. n

Despite the uncertainty, The Thing's brilliant storytelling and suspense remain engaging for audiences, showcasing Carpenter's ability to instill fear and thrill even with minimal information.

nWhat are the theories about who becomes The Thing?

The main theories suggest that either MacReady or Childs becomes The Thing at the movie's climax. Joe Russo's theory leans towards MacReady, citing his actions and dialogue at the end, while others argue Childs might be the one assimilated due to his mysterious absence during the final moments.

The Thing is a film that combines science fiction with horror, focusing on a group of researchers in Antarctica who encounter a shape-shifting alien. The film is noted for its practical effects and stays highly regarded, repeatedly resurfacing in discussions about horror and cinema's impact over the years. The ambiguity of the characters' fates adds to its enduring appeal, inviting audiences to speculate on the real identities of the survivors.