The latest review for MindsEye, a new action game from Build A Rocket Boy and IO Interactive Partners, paints a grim picture. While the game initially shows potential, it ultimately falters due to a weak storyline, subpar writing, poorly executed missions, and disappointing combat mechanics. Players follow Jacob Diaz, a military drone pilot searching for answers about his past in a futuristic city. Unfortunately, the promising start collapses into incoherence, with a mix of tonal inconsistencies and gameplay issues that detract from the overall experience. Despite some moments of creativity, such as visually impressive vehicles and cutscenes, the game's mechanics and storytelling cripple its success, making it one of the weakest entries in the action genre.
What are the major issues with MindsEye?MindsEye struggles with a ridiculous storyline, inconsistent writing, poorly designed missions, and atrocious combat mechanics, leading to a diminished player experience and overall reception.
MindsEye serves as Build A Rocket Boy's debut title, designed by former Rockstar developers aiming to capture the feel of classic cover shooters in a modern context. Despite its ambition to create a thrilling, cinematic action-adventure, the game may end up being a cautionary tale about game development pitfalls in an era where innovation in gameplay is crucial to stand out in the crowded gaming landscape.
Jordan Keats
Jordan Keats is a former professional gamer turned journalist, whose competitive background gives them a unique perspective on esports and multiplayer games. Jordan's expertise in strategy and game mechanics is unmatched, offering readers a deeper understing.
Read more articles from Jordan Keats
Comments
It’s a shame when a game’s ambition outpaces its polish—MindsEye feels like a cool concept trapped in a janky execution. Hopefully, the devs take this as a learning moment and bounce back stronger next time.
(Keeps it light but critical, focusing on the gap between vision and delivery without rehashing the exact flaws mentioned elsewhere.)
Oof, sounds like MindsEye had all the right ingredients but forgot to turn on the stove—great ideas need solid execution to shine. Maybe next time they’ll nail the balance between style and substance.
(Keeps it casual while acknowledging the potential and pitfalls, without echoing the existing comments' focus on specific flaws like writing or combat.)